Current:Home > reviewsJudge denies Mark Meadows’ request to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court -AssetVision
Judge denies Mark Meadows’ request to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court
View
Date:2025-04-18 09:27:29
ATLANTA (AP) — A judge on Friday denied Mark Meadows’ request to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court, ruling that the Trump White House chief of staff must fight the charges in state court instead.
U.S. District Judge Steve Jones in Atlanta wrote in a 49-page ruling that Meadows “has not met even the ‘quite low’ threshold” to move his case to federal court, noting that the question was whether the actions at issue were related to his role as a federal official.
“The evidence adduced at the hearing establishes that the actions at the heart of the State’s charges against Meadows were taken on behalf of the Trump campaign with an ultimate goal of affecting state election activities and procedures,” Jones wrote. “Meadows himself testified that working for the Trump campaign would be outside the scope of a White House Chief of Staff.”
The ruling is a big early win for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who spent 2 1/2 years investigating and building the case against former President Donald Trump, Meadows and 17 others before obtaining the sweeping indictment under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law. She has said she wants to try all the defendants together.
A lawyer for Meadows did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday evening. But it seems likely that Meadows will appeal the ruling. In a court filing earlier this week, he asked to separate his case from the other defendants in the case and to halt his proceedings in the state court until a final determination is reached on his attempt to move to federal court, “including through appeal, if an appeal is taken.”
A spokesperson for Willis declined to comment.
Several other people charged in the indictment have also filed motions seeking to move their cases to federal court and have hearings before Jones later this month. Friday’s ruling in Meadows’ case could spell trouble for the others.
Meadows and the others were indicted last month by a Fulton County grand jury on charges they participated in a sprawling scheme to illegally try to overturn Trump’s 2020 presidential election loss in Georgia even though the state’s voters had selected Joe Biden.
All have pleaded not guilty.
Meadows said his actions were taken as part of his role as chief of staff to the Republican president. He and his lawyers also argued that, since he was a federal official at the time, the charges against him should be heard in federal court and, ultimately, dismissed for lack of merit.
Prosecutors said the actions laid out in the indictment were meant to keep Trump in office after he lost to Biden, a Democrat. They said the acts were explicitly political in nature and are illegal under the Hatch Act, which restricts partisan political activity by federal employees. As such, they said, the case should stay in Fulton County Superior Court.
The practical effects of Meadows’ case moving to federal court would have been a jury pool that includes a broader area than just overwhelmingly Democratic Fulton County and a trial that would not be photographed or televised, as cameras are not allowed inside federal courtrooms. But it would not open the door for Trump, if he’s reelected in 2024, or another president to pardon Meadows because any conviction would still happen under state law.
veryGood! (733)
Related
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Young Thug trial delayed until January after YSL defendant stabbed in jail
- The Supreme Court will hear arguments about mifepristone. What is the drug and how does it work?
- Hackers had access to patient information for months in New York hospital cyberattack, officials say
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Owner of Washington Wizards and Capitals seriously considering leaving D.C. for Virginia
- Apple now requires court orders in U.S. to access push notification data
- Gunmen kill four soldiers, abduct two South Koreans in ambush in southern Nigeria
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Rutgers football coach Greg Schiano receives contract extension, pay increase
Ranking
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- André Braugher mourned by 'Brooklyn Nine-Nine' co-star Terry Crews: 'You taught me so much'
- Young Thug's racketeering trial delayed to 2024 after co-defendant stabbed in Atlanta jail
- Could a sex scandal force Moms for Liberty cofounder off school board? What we know.
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Luke Combs helping a fan who almost owed him $250,000 for selling unauthorized merchandise
- Draymond Green likely facing another suspension after striking Suns' Jusuf Nurkic
- 'Disgusting' Satanic Temple display at state capitol in Iowa sparks free speech battle
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Colombia investigates the killing of a Hmong American comedian and activist in Medellin
New superintendent selected for Mississippi’s Madison County Schools
What small businesses need to know about new regulations going into 2024
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
The Supreme Court will rule on limits on a commonly used abortion medication
Why dictionary.com's word of the year is hallucinate
Is a soft landing in sight? What the Fed funds rate and mortgage rates are hinting at