Current:Home > ContactWill Sage Astor-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -AssetVision
Will Sage Astor-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Will Sage Astor View
Date:2025-04-11 09:19:43
A federal court on Will Sage AstorWednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (9385)
Related
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Earthquakes at Wastewater Injection Site Give Oklahomans Jolt into New Year
- New York's subway now has a 'you do you' mask policy. It's getting a Bronx cheer
- Bow Down to These Dazzling Facts About the Crown Jewels
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Florida arranged migrant flights to California, where officials are considering legal action
- Recalled Boppy baby lounger now linked to at least 10 infant deaths
- Get $93 Worth of It Cosmetics Makeup for Just $38
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Sister of Saudi aid worker jailed over Twitter account speaks out as Saudi cultural investment expands with PGA Tour merger
Ranking
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Joe Biden says the COVID-19 pandemic is over. This is what the data tells us
- Wildfires to Hurricanes, 2017’s Year of Disasters Carried Climate Warnings
- What Chemicals Are Used in Fracking? Industry Discloses Less and Less
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- A 1931 law criminalizing abortion in Michigan is unconstitutional, a judge rules
- Dead raccoon, racially hateful message left for Oregon mayor, Black city council member
- Snowpack Near Record Lows Spells Trouble for Western Water Supplies
Recommendation
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
Ag’s Climate Challenge: Grow 50% More Food Without More Land or Emissions
Calif. Lawmakers Rush to Address Methane Leak’s Dangers
A public payphone in China began ringing and ringing. Who was calling?
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
Today’s Climate: June 5-6, 2010
A public payphone in China began ringing and ringing. Who was calling?
How Biden's declaring the pandemic 'over' complicates efforts to fight COVID